首页> 外文OA文献 >Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines?
【2h】

Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines?

机译:通过触及和后superior上棘可确定哪些脊柱水平?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The line joining the superior aspect of the iliac crests posteriorly (the intercristal line) is commonly stated to cross the midline at the L4 or L4–5 spinal level on imaging. This study aimed to assess the spinal level identified through palpation of surface anatomy (iliac crests and posterior superior iliac spines) in adults and the level of agreement compared with the intercristal line identified through imaging. The study participants included consecutive adult patients undergoing prone fluoroscopically guided spinal injections for chronic low back pain at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, between April and July 2004. Prior to fluoroscopic imaging, each patient's surface anatomy was palpated by two examiners and lines created to form the palpated intercristal line and the posterior superior iliac spine line. Following imaging, the mid-line spinal levels identified by these palpated lines were recorded and the level of agreement (kappa coefficient) with the intercristal line formed by imaging of the iliac crests was assessed. The results showed that although the L4 or L4–5 spinal levels were identified on imaging of the intercristal line in 86.7% of 75 patients (49 female), the intercristal line formed through palpation tended to identify higher levels; the L3 or L3–4 spinal levels in 77.3% of cases and more commonly in females than in males (85.7 vs. 61.5%) and in patients with higher body mass indices. The level of agreement between the two lines was poor (κ = 0.05). The posterior superior iliac spine line identified the S2 spinous process in 51% and the S1 in 44% of 60 (45 female) patients. The results suggest that formation of the intercristal line by palpation of the iliac crests identifies different spinal levels to those identified by imaging and that both methods should be regarded as different instruments. In the clinical situation, it may be more appropriate to consider that palpation of the intercristal line is a guide for identifying the L3 or L3–4 spinal levels rather than the L4 or L4–5 levels, particularly in females and patients with higher body mass indices.
机译:通常在成像时表示stated骨后上方连接线(缝间线)在L4或L4-5脊椎水平穿过中线。这项研究旨在评估通过触诊成人的表面解剖结构((和后superior上棘)确定的脊柱水平,并将其与通过成像确定的晶间线相比较的一致性水平。研究参与者包括2004年4月至2004年7月间在伯明翰皇家骨科医院接受俯卧位透视引导下脊柱注射治疗慢性腰背痛的成年患者。在透视成像之前,两名检查员触诊了每位患者的表面解剖结构,并建立了线形成触诊的缝间线和后上棘线。成像后,记录由这些触诊线识别出的中线脊柱水平,并评估与imaging成像所形成的缝间线的一致性水平(kappa系数)。结果表明,尽管在75例患者中49.7%(49名女性)的晶状体间层成像中发现了L4或L4-5脊柱水平,但是通过触诊形成的晶状体间层倾向于识别出更高的水平。 L3或L3–4脊柱水平在77.3%的病例中,女性比男性(分别为85.7和61.5%)和更高的体重指数患者更常见。两条线之间的一致性水平很差(κ= 0.05)。在60名(45名女性)患者中,51后上棘线识别出51%的S2棘突和44%的S1。结果表明,通过pa的触诊形成的间质线可识别与通过成像识别的脊柱水平不同的脊柱水平,并且两种方法均应视为不同的器械。在临床情况下,可能更合适的做法是认为触诊间线是确定L3或L3-4脊柱水平而非L4或L4-5脊柱水平的指南,特别是在女性和体重较高的患者中索引。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号